We’re at the end of another college football regular season
and predictably the call for some kind of playoff to determine the national
championship is being advocated by most of those who have easy access to sports
columns or microphones. The complaint this year is that the two teams most
likely to play in the championship game this year – LSU and Alabama – are from
the same division of the same conference and have already played each other
(LSU beat Alabama). Curiously, virtually everyone agrees that these are the two
best teams in college football, but paradoxically there apparently is still a “need”
for a playoff – Why? To somehow confirm what everyone agrees to? To give a
chance for a lesser team to pull an upset of the better team? Isn’t the
assumption and claim of a “national champion” that of the best team in the
country? This contradiction is admitted (albeit unwittingly) by those desirous
of a playoff. Inevitably, at some point in the discussion, one or more of the
proponents of a playoff will point out, without hint of self-awareness, that “anyone
can beat anyone else on any one day.” If that’s so – and it is, we see it every
week throughout the season – then all a playoff (with four or eight teams) yields
is the team who played the best (or beat a team who played the worst) on a
particular day or two or three. Which brings me to my primary discomfort with
the drumbeat for a playoff – Why do we need a “national champion” in the first
place? The whole “best of” concept eludes me. That’s why I favor the bowl
system (preferably the one from at least three decades ago, before there were
40 games spread out over a month). It admits that there are a certain number of
teams that have been better through the year than most of the other teams and
rewards those certain teams by sending them (and their fans) to warm-weather
climes for laudatory games.
I write here of a romantic ideal, realizing of course that
the driving force in determining a college football champion is TV and the
piles of money that filters through it. Whatever makes the most money for the
TV networks (playoff) and the NCAA (bowls) will ultimately win out. Probably
some compromise of both systems. And that will compromise the whole mess. But
it’s no doubt too late to hope for anything better. TV and its money long ago
corrupted college sports.
No comments:
Post a Comment